Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

systems analysis

You can’t make decisions based on 40,000 pages of paper, McNamara was wrong

January 19, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

MCNEIL: … the budget system got pretty complicated under [Robert] McNamara. It took them years to wake up to the fact that he was not […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

DoD programs are over-analyzed, yet decisions remain superficial and shallow

January 12, 2022 Eric Lofgren 2

I drop you into an exchange between Senator Scoop Jackson and Alain Enthoven, ASD Systems Analysis and one of McNamara’s ‘whiz kids,’ in a 1967 […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Does acquisition depend too much on assumptions, not enough on accountability?

December 16, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

James Roherty’s classic 1970 book, The Decisions of Robert S McNamara has a pair of interesting discussions on the takeover of systems analysis on military […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Risk mitigation and the question of Chinese anti-stealth radar

October 13, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Here’s the excellent Chad Millette, the chief learning officer at Space System Command, on LinkedIn: Eric Lofgren, you suggest in reference to the story about […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

If Congress doesn’t make multi-billion dollar weapon decisions, who should?

August 13, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Senator Karl Mundt expressed it in hearings on PPBS conducted in 1967: We used to face the question: “How much should we spend for a […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The false efficiency of systems analysis

May 27, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

The revolutionary manner in which McNamara made his decisions… transformed the “expert” career bureaucrat into the “novice” and the “inexperienced” political appointee into the “professional.” […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

DoD processes increase complexity, cost at the expense of reliability

January 9, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

The prospect of technological advances still persuades planners and decisionmakers to seek increased performance, greater precision, added function capability, and thus more complexity, all of […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Defense management is killing competition

January 7, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

The genius of the capitalist system is that it has no pretensions about prediction: It does not preselect winners and losers but instead facilitates competition […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Difference between operations research and systems analysis — one is much harder!

July 22, 2020 Eric Lofgren 1

Since operations research deals with optimization problems in which criteria, alternatives, and other parameters are given, in a sense, the solution to the problem lies […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Can we do away with judgment/intuition in systems design?

March 18, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

The judgement inherent in this balancing of programs and systems can no longer be intuitive or rely on past experience alone. The range of choice […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

What do systems engineers wrongly assume?

January 16, 2020 Eric Lofgren 4

On of the key mis-assumptions in modern Systems Engineering and Systems Analysis is that the total problem can, and frequently is, decomposed into subproblems, the […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

No more one-horse races for weapon systems

August 30, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Programs like MBT-70, C-5A, and the F-111 get defended before Congress and the American public-whatever their problems in performance, cost, and schedule slippages-simply because the […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Podcast: Todd Harrison on the military space reorg. and everything else

August 7, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Todd Harrison joined me on the Acquisition Talk podcast to discuss a wide range of issues, including how the reorganization of defense space forces is […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Competitive prototyping and pushing the state of the art

July 6, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Only when the contractor is taking risks to develop the state-of-the-art and do something better than has ever been done before can there be much […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The market as a discovery procedure

March 11, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

They had a healthfully vague understanding that the dynamic competition which is always at work in free markets. It continually inspires market movements, movements in […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts pagination

1 2 »

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • Podcast: Revamping the way we think about defense with Steve Blank
  • How can the SBIR/STTR process be more welcoming to startups?
  • Acquisition headlines (9/26 – 10/2/2022)
  • Why I push back on the “colorless” appropriation for software
  • Sources of defense tech transition funding
  • Acquisition headlines (10/11 – 10/17/2021)
  • GAO investigates why agency funds get cancelled

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes