Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

systems analysis

You can’t make decisions based on 40,000 pages of paper, McNamara was wrong

January 19, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

MCNEIL: … the budget system got pretty complicated under [Robert] McNamara. It took them years to wake up to the fact that he was not […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

DoD programs are over-analyzed, yet decisions remain superficial and shallow

January 12, 2022 Eric Lofgren 2

I drop you into an exchange between Senator Scoop Jackson and Alain Enthoven, ASD Systems Analysis and one of McNamara’s ‘whiz kids,’ in a 1967 […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Does acquisition depend too much on assumptions, not enough on accountability?

December 16, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

James Roherty’s classic 1970 book, The Decisions of Robert S McNamara has a pair of interesting discussions on the takeover of systems analysis on military […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Risk mitigation and the question of Chinese anti-stealth radar

October 13, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Here’s the excellent Chad Millette, the chief learning officer at Space System Command, on LinkedIn: Eric Lofgren, you suggest in reference to the story about […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

If Congress doesn’t make multi-billion dollar weapon decisions, who should?

August 13, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Senator Karl Mundt expressed it in hearings on PPBS conducted in 1967: We used to face the question: “How much should we spend for a […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The false efficiency of systems analysis

May 27, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

The revolutionary manner in which McNamara made his decisions… transformed the “expert” career bureaucrat into the “novice” and the “inexperienced” political appointee into the “professional.” […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

DoD processes increase complexity, cost at the expense of reliability

January 9, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

The prospect of technological advances still persuades planners and decisionmakers to seek increased performance, greater precision, added function capability, and thus more complexity, all of […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Defense management is killing competition

January 7, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

The genius of the capitalist system is that it has no pretensions about prediction: It does not preselect winners and losers but instead facilitates competition […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Difference between operations research and systems analysis — one is much harder!

July 22, 2020 Eric Lofgren 1

Since operations research deals with optimization problems in which criteria, alternatives, and other parameters are given, in a sense, the solution to the problem lies […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Can we do away with judgment/intuition in systems design?

March 18, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

The judgement inherent in this balancing of programs and systems can no longer be intuitive or rely on past experience alone. The range of choice […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

What do systems engineers wrongly assume?

January 16, 2020 Eric Lofgren 4

On of the key mis-assumptions in modern Systems Engineering and Systems Analysis is that the total problem can, and frequently is, decomposed into subproblems, the […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

No more one-horse races for weapon systems

August 30, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Programs like MBT-70, C-5A, and the F-111 get defended before Congress and the American public-whatever their problems in performance, cost, and schedule slippages-simply because the […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Podcast: Todd Harrison on the military space reorg. and everything else

August 7, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Todd Harrison joined me on the Acquisition Talk podcast to discuss a wide range of issues, including how the reorganization of defense space forces is […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Competitive prototyping and pushing the state of the art

July 6, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Only when the contractor is taking risks to develop the state-of-the-art and do something better than has ever been done before can there be much […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The market as a discovery procedure

March 11, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

They had a healthfully vague understanding that the dynamic competition which is always at work in free markets. It continually inspires market movements, movements in […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts pagination

1 2 »

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • What is holding modular open systems back in defense?
  • Anduril grows revenue to $150M in its first five years
  • The value of NASA contracts to SpaceX for launch
  • Acquisition headlines (2/7 – 2/13/2021)
  • Acquisition Headlines
  • What, if anything, is new about DevSecOps?
  • Is DoD’s acquisition culture a threat to national security?

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes