Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

Acquisition headlines (3/14 – 3/20/2022)

March 21, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Cyber Command prepares to gain significant budget control. (Fed Scoop) “The fiscal 2022 National Defense Authorization Act gave the commander of Cybercom responsibility for direct control […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Reducing uncertainty and discretion in development contracts

March 18, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

The market for defense R&D is imperfect and fails to provide a reliable mechanism by which the government can automatically secure performance at or near […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Should organization follow programs, or the other way around? Issues in PPBE reform

March 17, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

The main points which will be stressed in the succeeding paragraphs are: first, that PPBS has been and is being oversold and, in some ways, […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

DoD needs to rebuild competency in hypersonic flight test

March 16, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

We need to move rapidly toward weaponization of hypersonics. We have already demonstrated that we have the technical understanding to address both the challenges of […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Other Transactions continued growing in FY21, but will it soon level off?

March 15, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Contracts using other transaction authority saw another year of growth in the Department of Defense, but only when excluding awards for COVID-19. Obligations unrelated to […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Acquisition headlines (3/7 – 3/13/2022)

March 14, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Show, don’t tell: Navy changes strategy to sell unmanned systems to skeptical Congress. (Breaking Defense) “Public discussions between the Navy and Congress over unmanned technology […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

When acquisition theory runs into funding realities

March 11, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

In unmanned maritime systems, the Navy’s learning curve and operational experience is rapidly accelerating… For example, Task Force 59 is challenging the process in which […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Podcast: Opening programs to modularity and iteration

March 10, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

In this special episode of the Acquisition Talk podcast, we listen into an event that explores how defense programs can harness modern development practices. Center […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

How weapons become overoptimized to the point they become brittle

March 9, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Here is Roland McKean, one of the founders of the DoD’s Planning-Programming-Budgeting system, who later in the 1960s saw the errors of what he helped […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Space Force acquisition reorg moves in the right direction

March 8, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Following a 90-day review, the head of Space Systems Command Lt. Gen. Michael Guetlein proposed a new structure built around five program executive offices: Assured Access […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Acquisition headlines (2/28 – 3/6/2022)

March 7, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Addressing DoD’s tech focus areas requires new approaches. (DoD) DIU’s Michael Brown at a Mason GovCon event: “We don’t start with requirements, which often dictates […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The fractured nature of accountability in defense acquisition

March 4, 2022 Eric Lofgren 4

I was talking to someone the other day quite senior in the acquisition arm of a service who was basically saying look — my role […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

How the Saab Gripen fighter can rapidly develop and deploy software

March 3, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

The ability to embrace change was one of the important factors taken into account while designing Gripen E. The fighter, with its smart split avionics, […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Have irregularities marked the success of weapons programs in years past?

March 2, 2022 Eric Lofgren 1

Jerry McGinn: … the Department of Defense is stuck with the ’60s approaches which requires three years to really plan and then program and then […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

CSAF Brown’s struggle against bureaucracy and why there’s resistance to top-down plans

March 1, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

CSAF CQ Brown’s desire to accelerate decision making in the Air Force — “accelerate or lose” — seems to not be going as well as […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts navigation

1 2 … 78 »

Get posts by email

Search

Eric LofgrenFollow

Eric Lofgren
AcqTalkEric Lofgren@AcqTalk·
19 Mar

"JADC2 transcends any single capability, platform, or system."
- New JADC2 Strategy

The strategy lays out “three guiding C2 functions of ‘sense,’ ‘make sense,’ and ‘act,’ and an additional five enduring lines of effort.”

clear nuff?

@DefenseCharts
https://breakingdefense.com/2022/03/pentagons-jadc2-strategy-more-questions-than-answers/

Reply on Twitter 1504994531695079425Retweet on Twitter 1504994531695079425Like on Twitter 15049945316950794254
AcqTalkEric Lofgren@AcqTalk·
27 Feb

A good reason for "founder-led defense programs" -- choose good people, get out of the way, but check up on results, and good weapons will result.

But today, DoD let's analysts with no responsibility decide the weapons while managers cycle in and out, executing standing orders.

Chris Hladczuk@chrishlad

The Buffett Management Philosophy

Buy businesses with superstar managers.

"If we did more business operating, less would be accomplished.

Instead, get out of the way.

If you coach a basketball team with Lebron James, don't tell him how to dribble the ball.

1988

Reply on Twitter 1498049222154899458Retweet on Twitter 14980492221548994582Like on Twitter 14980492221548994588
AcqTalkEric Lofgren@AcqTalk·
23 Feb

DoD reports 685 AI/ML projects in DoD... but it doesn't really know.

Seems like they just searched budget j-docs for anything with AI/ML terms. DoD dollars for it are simply unknown.

https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22-104765.pdf

Reply on Twitter 1496486361033056260Retweet on Twitter 14964863610330562603Like on Twitter 149648636103305626018
Load More...

Featured

  • Defense Acquisition as a Cost Disease Sector: What’s the Evidence?
  • Galambos on Innovation, Systems of Systems, and Logistics
  • How large is military spending in the US and China?
  • What Palantir and Lockheed’s financials say about the GovCon business
  • Interpreting the Navy’s FY 2020 shipbuilding plan
  • To End the Reform Pendulum, Fix the Budget
  • Rapid acquisition pathways for software — Sec. 801 (FY20 NDAA)
  • How SpaceX does software for 9 vehicles with only 50 developers — and gov’t requiring 50x the staff
  • Unified cybersecurity standards, allowable costs, and whether it makes a difference
  • Thorny questions about Air Force’s pronounced 100 years of savings
  • Can the F-35 take the place of the A-10?
  • The “Valley of Death” and the PPBS in defense technology transition
  • Remember the days when Congress didn’t earmark defense projects?
  • Why the zero-based budget is not effective
  • How to save $1 trillion on defense spending

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Copyright © 2022 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes