Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

requirements

The damage to R&D caused by bureaucrats planning the creative process

November 4, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Here’s a letter from Bill McClean, chief at Navy’s China Lake and led the Sidewinder development, to the deputy chief of Naval Operations: We find […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Why is defense innovation so slow?

October 19, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

If a clever engineer imagines a new weapon for the Air Force, and if the research-and-development office specializing in that class of weapons approves of […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Navy research chief’s take on what’s slowing down the fleet’s transformation

September 23, 2021 Eric Lofgren 2

Here is Rear Adm. Selby, chief of naval research, speaking with Vago Muradian: I’m really pushing back at the idea of requirements. I think the […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The “valley of death” is but one symptom of the broader governance problems found in PPBE

August 25, 2021 Eric Lofgren 4

The PPBE was really a revolutionary and radical idea. One of the things it was trying to do was reduce duplication and overlap. You might […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

GMU Playbook: Make market research a core and continuous organizational capability

July 7, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

In this week’s blog post on our acquisition playbook study, we discuss a recommendation to make market research a core and continuous organizational capability. No […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

GMU Playbook: Make room for opportunities in program requirements

June 30, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

George Mason University’s Center for Government Contracting is actively gathering feedback on its recently released draft playbook. Over the next several weeks, we will provide […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Army IVAS HoloLens program shows DoD how to do iterative requirements

June 18, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Soldier input directly shaped many of the headset’s key features. Early prototypes included a HoloLens headset that engineers had affixed cameras to, goggles with weights […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Podcast: Next steps in acquisition reform with Dan Ward, Pete Modigliani, and Matt MacGregor

June 16, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

I was pleased to have an impressive trio from MITRE join me on the Acquisition Talk podcast to discuss the future of acquisition reform. Dan […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Podcast: eVTOLs, Agility Prime, and AFWERX with Col. Nathan Diller

March 17, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Colonel Nathan Diller joined me on the Acquisition Talk podcast to discuss the Agility Prime line of effort that seeks an innovative acquisition approach to […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

DIU update: the 2020 annual report

March 3, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Key statistics from DIU’s 2020 annual report that I compiled: Subject 2020 2019 2016-2020 Projects 23 95 Commercial Proposals 944 466 2,381 Proposals per Solicitation […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Why the Army ditched its organic design for OMFV

December 30, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

The Army’s decision to not submit its own design bid for the restarted Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV) prototype competition was to remove concerns over […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Moving from opinion-based to evidence-based requirements

December 26, 2020 Eric Lofgren 4

Business models for developing technologies for a profit are end-to-end solutions that cannot be adopted by the Army acquisition enterprise for several reasons, not the […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Podcast: Digital acquisition with Bryon Kroger and Matt Nelson

December 8, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

Bryon Kroger and Matt Nelson joined me on the Acquisition Talk podcast to talk about digital transformation in the Department of Defense. They are the […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The Air Force ‘Internet of Things’ program gets reorganized

November 30, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

According to a memo sent from Roper to the Air Force’s acquisition workforce Tuesday, the chief architect will remain responsible for codifying ABMS [Advanced Battle […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Defense R&D remains constrained to specific requirements

October 16, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

The prospect of technological advances still persuades planners and decisionmakers to seek increased performance, greater precision, added function capability, and thus more complexity, all of […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts pagination

« 1 2 3 »

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • What’s holding back SBIR and new entrants from transforming DoD?
  • Acquisition headlines (5/31/2020 – 6/6/2020)
  • Consortia-based OTAs larger, but slower growing than stand-alone OTA
  • In the Pentagon, money takes so long it’s a death sentence for new tech
  • To stop industrial consolidation, DoD must look in the mirror
  • The challenges of getting SBIR funding, and are things better in Canada?
  • Risk, micromanagement, and mission command

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes