Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

middle-tier

An uncertain future for Middle-Tier of Acquisition

February 7, 2023 Eric Lofgren 2

Here’s a couple slices from an interesting Breaking Defense article on Middle-Tier of Acquisition (MTA) pathway for rapid prototyping and rapid fielding. First, what’s going […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Middle-Tier of Acquisition is under serious threat unless oversight can think differently

July 27, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Here’s an update on Middle-Tier of Acquisition (MTA) authorities and how they are facing serious backlash from oversight. MTAs, of course, provide DoD rapid prototyping […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

GAO struggles to define oversight for the Adaptive Acquisition Framework

April 12, 2022 Eric Lofgren 1

Here’s the General Accountability Office’s take on Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA) in space systems from a recent report. Remember, MTA efforts must be rapidly […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Software Acquisition Pathway meets a requirements roadblock from the Joint Staff

January 26, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Sponsors utilizing the software acquisition pathway per reference III for software only will submit a Software-ICD (SW-ICD) to the Joint Staff Gatekeeper to assess for […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The state of defense acquisition as 2021 draws to a close

December 24, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Previously, I discussed the messaging from the Reagan National Defense Forum that “Time is running out with Silicon Valley.” It was intimated that major acquisition […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Are we starting to see the backlash to OTAs?

November 26, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Here’s a Q&A from a Mitchell Institute webinar discussing Other Transactions (OTAs): Audience question: There’s lots of new platforms being developed or being procured under […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Release of the DoDI 5000.91 Product Support Management

November 18, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

The DoDI 5000.91 Product Support Strategy contains 12 elements in the Integrated Product Support (IPS) and 10 elements in the Lifecycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP). This […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Is DoD starting to bridge the valley of death?

September 17, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

… funding for Advanced Components Development and Prototypes (6.4 funding) has increased from 20.4% of total RDT&E funding in 2012 to 30.2% in the enacted […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

New DoD cost estimating guide fails to address the problems facing the cost community

February 23, 2021 Eric Lofgren 2

“No one can predict the future” is an often-used cliché, and yet this is what the DoD asks its cost estimating community to do every […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Sustainment planning gets an overhaul in FY21 NDAA

February 17, 2021 Eric Lofgren 2

Section 802 of the FY 2021 NDAA is called “Improving planning, execution, and oversight of life cycle sustainment activities,” but really it has dramatic effect […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Are we at a crisis point in acquisition reform?

December 7, 2020 Eric Lofgren 3

Francis Rose: Every uniformed official that I ever hear anything from talks about speed… When there’s legislative language that proposes exactly the opposite, is working […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Are Appropriators blocking defense transformation?

November 12, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

I recommend reading a nice Breaking Defense article, Senate Appropriators Cut R&D To Buy More Weapons. The SAC-D recommended that the Air Force and Navy […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Take-aways from the updated DoD Directive 5000.01

September 15, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

Overall, DoDD 5000.01 went from 10 pages to 16, though two of those are for a table of contents. In terms of word count, it […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Congress has a bold vision for Navy subsystem prototyping, but here’s what they’re missing

July 10, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

As the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has documented, lead ships in new classes of naval vessels routinely fail to meet expectations… It was not always this […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

How much oomph is left in rapid acquisition reform?

May 6, 2020 Eric Lofgren 2

We’ve seen this pendulum swing drastically over the last few decades. In the middle of the 20th Century we saw thousands of companies iteratively delivering […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts pagination

1 2 »

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • Acquisition headlines 3/28 – 4/3/2022
  • Acquisition headlines
  • Is software showing the cracks in DoD’s industrial age system?
  • Data on SBIR, open topics, and the defense industry
  • The cost, business model, and infrastructure of hypersonic vehicles
  • How delegation of authority is proceeding in Air Force contracting
  • Why aren’t investors interested in defense?

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes