Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

middle-tier

An uncertain future for Middle-Tier of Acquisition

February 7, 2023 Eric Lofgren 2

Here’s a couple slices from an interesting Breaking Defense article on Middle-Tier of Acquisition (MTA) pathway for rapid prototyping and rapid fielding. First, what’s going […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Middle-Tier of Acquisition is under serious threat unless oversight can think differently

July 27, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Here’s an update on Middle-Tier of Acquisition (MTA) authorities and how they are facing serious backlash from oversight. MTAs, of course, provide DoD rapid prototyping […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

GAO struggles to define oversight for the Adaptive Acquisition Framework

April 12, 2022 Eric Lofgren 1

Here’s the General Accountability Office’s take on Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA) in space systems from a recent report. Remember, MTA efforts must be rapidly […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Software Acquisition Pathway meets a requirements roadblock from the Joint Staff

January 26, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Sponsors utilizing the software acquisition pathway per reference III for software only will submit a Software-ICD (SW-ICD) to the Joint Staff Gatekeeper to assess for […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The state of defense acquisition as 2021 draws to a close

December 24, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Previously, I discussed the messaging from the Reagan National Defense Forum that “Time is running out with Silicon Valley.” It was intimated that major acquisition […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Are we starting to see the backlash to OTAs?

November 26, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Here’s a Q&A from a Mitchell Institute webinar discussing Other Transactions (OTAs): Audience question: There’s lots of new platforms being developed or being procured under […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Release of the DoDI 5000.91 Product Support Management

November 18, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

The DoDI 5000.91 Product Support Strategy contains 12 elements in the Integrated Product Support (IPS) and 10 elements in the Lifecycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP). This […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Is DoD starting to bridge the valley of death?

September 17, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

… funding for Advanced Components Development and Prototypes (6.4 funding) has increased from 20.4% of total RDT&E funding in 2012 to 30.2% in the enacted […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

New DoD cost estimating guide fails to address the problems facing the cost community

February 23, 2021 Eric Lofgren 2

“No one can predict the future” is an often-used cliché, and yet this is what the DoD asks its cost estimating community to do every […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Sustainment planning gets an overhaul in FY21 NDAA

February 17, 2021 Eric Lofgren 2

Section 802 of the FY 2021 NDAA is called “Improving planning, execution, and oversight of life cycle sustainment activities,” but really it has dramatic effect […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Are we at a crisis point in acquisition reform?

December 7, 2020 Eric Lofgren 3

Francis Rose: Every uniformed official that I ever hear anything from talks about speed… When there’s legislative language that proposes exactly the opposite, is working […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Are Appropriators blocking defense transformation?

November 12, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

I recommend reading a nice Breaking Defense article, Senate Appropriators Cut R&D To Buy More Weapons. The SAC-D recommended that the Air Force and Navy […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Take-aways from the updated DoD Directive 5000.01

September 15, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

Overall, DoDD 5000.01 went from 10 pages to 16, though two of those are for a table of contents. In terms of word count, it […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Congress has a bold vision for Navy subsystem prototyping, but here’s what they’re missing

July 10, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

As the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has documented, lead ships in new classes of naval vessels routinely fail to meet expectations… It was not always this […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

How much oomph is left in rapid acquisition reform?

May 6, 2020 Eric Lofgren 2

We’ve seen this pendulum swing drastically over the last few decades. In the middle of the 20th Century we saw thousands of companies iteratively delivering […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts pagination

1 2 »

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • Could blockchain help solve JADC2’s composability problem?
  • Acquisition headlines
  • Podcast: The future of Navy software development with Lt. Sean Lavelle
  • What does the 20-year delivery on the AUKUS deal say about US power?
  • Effects of performance management systems
  • When can DoD get by without competitive prototyping?
  • Top researchers spend 50% of their time writing grants, how to fix it, and what it means for DoD

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes