Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

requirements-pull

The damage to R&D caused by bureaucrats planning the creative process

November 4, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Here’s a letter from Bill McClean, chief at Navy’s China Lake and led the Sidewinder development, to the deputy chief of Naval Operations: We find […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

DoD processes increase complexity, cost at the expense of reliability

January 9, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

The prospect of technological advances still persuades planners and decisionmakers to seek increased performance, greater precision, added function capability, and thus more complexity, all of […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Lessons for Today: Opposition to ballistic missiles in the 1940s/50s

February 25, 2020 Eric Lofgren 2

There was, without question, deep and sincere opposition to the accelerated development of ballistic missiles. It was chiefly effective in the years between 1950 and […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Explaining the valley of death in defense technology

December 9, 2019 Eric Lofgren 16

I’m going to walk though some an excellent set of slides on the “valley of death” problem from Gary Hagan over at DAU. Let’s start […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Differing opinions of requirements: how fixed should they be ahead of prototyping?

November 20, 2019 Eric Lofgren 2

Here is the opinion of the Requirements & Concepts Panel for the Army Materiel Acquisition Review Committee (AMARC) of 1974: In the opinion of our […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Out with the heel-to-toe acquisition process, in with DevOps

November 16, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

We realized it was time to stop the heel-to-toe acquisition process of developing a concept and then going to Combats Development to develop a requirement, […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Defense programs start with the build process, not exploratory developments

September 12, 2019 Eric Lofgren 1

The DoD does not have an effective process for doing a thorough exploration of alternative technologies and concepts. Exploration is usually done only as a […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

How the DOD failed to follow up on hypersonics decades ago

August 22, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

The key technology for hypersonic air-breathing propulsion at higher flight Mach numbers is the supersonic combustion ramjet (scramjet). In this device, injection of hydrogen fuel […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

I beseech you, Norm Augustine, to think it possible you be mistaken

May 13, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Defense acquisition in the United States is quite unique. It is a monopsony that has monopolies embedded within it. People’s lives — even our nation’s […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Why the zero-based budget is not effective

April 30, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Following in the steps of the Army, which did a “night court” deep-dive look at its budget to identify about $25 billion in savings to apply towards […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Software generates requirements that pulls hardware into the future

April 22, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Software is very different. It’s not, “I’m going to do a new mode of production that’s going to do more with less.” It’s, “I’m going […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Battista on the ill-conceived OMB Circular A-109

April 8, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

We join an interesting conversation between Mr. Battista, a Pentagon watchdog and test advocate, and Representative Sheley. They are discussing the recent roll-out of OMB […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • NASA’s administrator says cost-plus is a “plague,” just as DoD is giving up on fixed-price development
  • Can the Air Force scale small companies into a program of record?
  • IP and CMMC — two issues that could derail defense innovation efforts
  • Defense acquisition decisions in a low-trust environment
  • Did neoliberal economics destroy government’s ability to execute programs? Not so fast…
  • Using the Defense Production Act to combat COVID-19
  • Seeing like a state, institutional legibility, and the collapse of defense innovation

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes