Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

organizational design

What’s the proper role of the Chief of Naval Operations?

September 28, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Here is a good piece on the organizational design of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations from Admiral Hyman Rickover’s 1974 speech, The […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

GMU Playbook: Make market research a core and continuous organizational capability

July 7, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

In this week’s blog post on our acquisition playbook study, we discuss a recommendation to make market research a core and continuous organizational capability. No […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Why I push back on the “colorless” appropriation for software

November 12, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

One of the hot topics in defense reform is the new Budget Activity 6.8 (or just 8), a “colorless” appropriation for Software and Digital Technology […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The Functionalist Takeover and the problem of organizational design in the DoD

September 25, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

[Secretary of Defense Neil McElroy] told the Senate Committee on Armed Services that the present assistant secretary could not “give orders.” McElroy proposed a civilian […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Have we reached peak “Chief …… Officer” in the DOD?

January 28, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

DoD leadership should focus on establishing business-reform objectives for each major DoD organization, and then holding leaders of these respective organizations accountable to the achievement […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Centralization was wrong for atomic power, the case of Britain and the US

December 7, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

The development of atomic power for the generation of electricity provides a useful illustration. In the mid-fifties major technical decisions had to be made with […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Loose cultures, tight cultures, and the USD(AT&L) break up

November 5, 2019 Eric Lofgren 2

Loose cultures have a great benefit in terms of creating ideas but they’re not necessarily great at implementing them. So you think of innovation, it […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Staffs set up a hierarchy within a hierarchy, creating built-in resistance from line officers

October 17, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

… there seems to be an inherent conflict between line and staff activities. In the first place, their functions largely overlap. The only way “doing” […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The SDA accountable, but not responsible, for space architecture

September 20, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

In August, 2018, the department put forward this report to Congress[that] … laid out these eight capabilities. … The Space Development Agency was set up […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Rickover’s concept of accountability differs from GAO

September 10, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

The Defense Department does not recognize the need for continuity in important jobs. It rotates officer every few years both at headquarters and in the […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

More on how gov’t can best support AI research

August 20, 2019 Eric Lofgren 1

Here is an excerpt from my recent War on the Rocks article, responding the call for ideas from the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Why the zero-based budget is not effective

April 30, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Following in the steps of the Army, which did a “night court” deep-dive look at its budget to identify about $25 billion in savings to apply towards […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The Defense Department was never intended to innovate?

April 25, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Innovation leaders often cite Eastman-Kodak as an example of an enterprise that was too dim-witted to see the writing on the wall and so fell from its […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

What worked in Germany’s WWII Air Force?

April 24, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Here is Admiral Rickover providing insight into innovative organizations: Admiral RICKOVER. This group is responsible for the design, the development, and the construction and operation […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Loonshots, moonshots, and management

March 28, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Sufi Bahcall has a new book out called Loonshots: How to Nurture the Crazy Ideas That Win Wars, Cure Diseases, and Transform Industries. He was […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts pagination

1 2 »

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • Here’s how much in-house R&D the military services did in the 1960s
  • STITCHES is getting stymied by the acquisition process
  • Kling Answers a Question on Defense Economics
  • Acquisition headlines (4/25 – 5/1/2022)
  • Podcast: No time to waste for defense innovation with BMNT’s Pete Newell
  • Never underestimate the program budget’s impact
  • Sunday Links

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes