Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

organizational design

What’s the proper role of the Chief of Naval Operations?

September 28, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Here is a good piece on the organizational design of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations from Admiral Hyman Rickover’s 1974 speech, The […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

GMU Playbook: Make market research a core and continuous organizational capability

July 7, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

In this week’s blog post on our acquisition playbook study, we discuss a recommendation to make market research a core and continuous organizational capability. No […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Why I push back on the “colorless” appropriation for software

November 12, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

One of the hot topics in defense reform is the new Budget Activity 6.8 (or just 8), a “colorless” appropriation for Software and Digital Technology […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The Functionalist Takeover and the problem of organizational design in the DoD

September 25, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

[Secretary of Defense Neil McElroy] told the Senate Committee on Armed Services that the present assistant secretary could not “give orders.” McElroy proposed a civilian […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Have we reached peak “Chief …… Officer” in the DOD?

January 28, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

DoD leadership should focus on establishing business-reform objectives for each major DoD organization, and then holding leaders of these respective organizations accountable to the achievement […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Centralization was wrong for atomic power, the case of Britain and the US

December 7, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

The development of atomic power for the generation of electricity provides a useful illustration. In the mid-fifties major technical decisions had to be made with […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Loose cultures, tight cultures, and the USD(AT&L) break up

November 5, 2019 Eric Lofgren 2

Loose cultures have a great benefit in terms of creating ideas but they’re not necessarily great at implementing them. So you think of innovation, it […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Staffs set up a hierarchy within a hierarchy, creating built-in resistance from line officers

October 17, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

… there seems to be an inherent conflict between line and staff activities. In the first place, their functions largely overlap. The only way “doing” […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The SDA accountable, but not responsible, for space architecture

September 20, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

In August, 2018, the department put forward this report to Congress[that] … laid out these eight capabilities. … The Space Development Agency was set up […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Rickover’s concept of accountability differs from GAO

September 10, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

The Defense Department does not recognize the need for continuity in important jobs. It rotates officer every few years both at headquarters and in the […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

More on how gov’t can best support AI research

August 20, 2019 Eric Lofgren 1

Here is an excerpt from my recent War on the Rocks article, responding the call for ideas from the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Why the zero-based budget is not effective

April 30, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Following in the steps of the Army, which did a “night court” deep-dive look at its budget to identify about $25 billion in savings to apply towards […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The Defense Department was never intended to innovate?

April 25, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Innovation leaders often cite Eastman-Kodak as an example of an enterprise that was too dim-witted to see the writing on the wall and so fell from its […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

What worked in Germany’s WWII Air Force?

April 24, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Here is Admiral Rickover providing insight into innovative organizations: Admiral RICKOVER. This group is responsible for the design, the development, and the construction and operation […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Loonshots, moonshots, and management

March 28, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Sufi Bahcall has a new book out called Loonshots: How to Nurture the Crazy Ideas That Win Wars, Cure Diseases, and Transform Industries. He was […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts pagination

1 2 »

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • Risk, micromanagement, and mission command
  • Software requires a faster funding process
  • Boeing’s KC-46 struggles, but here’s the payoff
  • The downfall of Southwest Airlines and management lessons for defense
  • A brief history of the munitions industrial base, and the importance of GOGOs
  • Acquisition headlines (11/7 – 11/13/2022)
  • Aerospace work isn’t too big and complex for new entrants

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes