Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

NASA

SpaceX’s speed to market is fast and getting faster. NASA… not so much.

November 1, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Here’s the excellent Bent Flyvbjerg and Atif Ansar’s latest article, Speed-to-Market for SpaceX and NASA. Note that the efforts tracked by Bent include Falcon 1, […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

SpaceX’s platform-based strategy beats bespoke requirements

June 21, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

Bent Flyvgjberg and Atif Ansar have a new article providing evidence that SpaceX projects outperform historical and contemporary competitors by using a platform approach. The […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

DoD needs to rebuild competency in hypersonic flight test

March 16, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

We need to move rapidly toward weaponization of hypersonics. We have already demonstrated that we have the technical understanding to address both the challenges of […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

GAO: To keep up with surging Congressional reporting, DoD should modernize

February 16, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

The Department of Defense is required to report to Congress on an array of national security topics each year. The number of new reporting requirements […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Did SpaceX and Palantir transform government contracting? A VC’s view

August 24, 2021 Eric Lofgren 1

The DoD is starting to run commercial-like procurement processes as opposed to purely cost-plus contracting. In traditional government contracting, the government comes up with a […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Why are analysts complicit in cost and schedule growth?

September 24, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

I showed that for 10 projects for which a cost risk analysis had been conducted, the actual cost was greater than the 90th percentile for […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

NASA sets a model using high-level requirements and letting private companies innovate

June 10, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

The cost-saving success of @Commercial_Crew is based on @NASA establishing high-level requirements and letting private companies innovate. For the Artemis Moon base, NASA will establish […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

How cost-plus contracting slowed space technologies, and the shift back to mission-based specs

November 11, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

It starts back in the 1960s with the Apollo program being successful. The way that space used to work back then was that everything was […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The value of NASA contracts to SpaceX for launch

May 16, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Again if you’ll compare the amounts Space[X] is receiving vs values to other launch providers for similar goals — they are always on the low […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • What is holding modular open systems back in defense?
  • George Mason University study on digital acquisition
  • Coordination in the market, science, and acquisition
  • Sunday Links
  • Pushing immature technology to meet requirements
  • Does EVMS serve any other purpose than to justify cost overruns?
  • Should organization follow programs, or the other way around? Issues in PPBE reform

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes