Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

Technology

French to U.S. on weapons development: How do you work with so many people?!?

January 25, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

Mr. Shapero: They [the French] make good aircraft, and they have also had disasters. But they do it much more cheaply than we do. Spending […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

F-16 running on Kubernetes and the challenges of a disconnected environment

January 4, 2020 Eric Lofgren 1

Just like almost everything else, military organizations increasingly depend on software, and they are turning to an array of open source cloud tools like Kubernetes […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Zuckerberg wisely advocates big bets on tools and people, not outputs

December 20, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

The government is the largest and most important funder of science, but the grants tend to be very spread out across a lot of people. […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

How shared equipment dramatically lowers barriers to deep tech R&D

December 13, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

In the same way that AWS dramatically lowered the bar to start a software company, you’re seeing the same thing of multiple labs-as-a-service companies that […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Agile at scale, decoupling teams, and enterprise software in the DOD

December 10, 2019 Eric Lofgren 3

One of the issues we see is programs trying going straight to the scaled agile development framework, like SAFe. We issued a memo highly discouraging […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Explaining the valley of death in defense technology

December 9, 2019 Eric Lofgren 16

I’m going to walk though some an excellent set of slides on the “valley of death” problem from Gary Hagan over at DAU. Let’s start […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Risk identification, the acquisition process, and system resiliency

November 26, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

“We want to expand people’s view about what technology is; it includes people and process and is part of a sociotechnical system,” Mineweaser said. “The […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Out with the heel-to-toe acquisition process, in with DevOps

November 16, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

We realized it was time to stop the heel-to-toe acquisition process of developing a concept and then going to Combats Development to develop a requirement, […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

How cost-plus contracting slowed space technologies, and the shift back to mission-based specs

November 11, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

It starts back in the 1960s with the Apollo program being successful. The way that space used to work back then was that everything was […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Agile, modular, and digital engineering — Roper’s tenants for the fighter-building business

November 4, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

But how we build aircraft, that doesn’t make sense. Approaching NGAD [next-generation air dominance] the way we did the F-35 would put us at great […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

How has DIU performed in transitioning technologies?

November 1, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Since 2015, millions of dollars have been invested in the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Unit, the agency watched as some of its projects fell flat, and […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Complexity science, “if-then” propositions, and how to make decisions

October 15, 2019 Eric Lofgren 1

I’m interested in complexity science, which, if you’re actually doing complexity science, it releases complexity. For example, in real complexity science, there’s an issue with […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Basic science and the transition to useful military products

October 1, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Here is more from the Combat Capabilities Development Command’s commanding general Cedric Wins on the US Army CCDC In the Lab Podcast. You have to […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

US Army R&D endorses mission command

September 28, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

I think frankly, what they thought was [we had] an industrial age model that existed and as we move into the 21st century and what […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Simulators, software, and complexity in weapons platforms

September 17, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Replicating platforms accurately in simulations remains one of the biggest challenges for the Army, according to a service official.   “As many of you know, […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts pagination

« 1 … 4 5 6 … 8 »

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • Acquisition headlines
  • Are SBIR contracts being dominated by very few companies, leading to poorer products?
  • Rickover on the difference between administrators and engineers
  • DoD’s fixation on cost stifles its ability to innovate
  • The debate over defining “legacy” weapon systems
  • Acquisition Headlines
  • Acquisition headlines

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes