Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

History

The Pentagon’s first comptroller was against merging the armed forces

July 15, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

In 1972, Jerry Hess interviews Wilfred McNeil, the Department of Defense’s Comptroller for the first five Secretaries of Defense: HESS: What were your views on […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

How McNamara’s top-down structure was flipped, but equally insidious forces prevailed

July 11, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

Taking the place of the Draft Presidential Memorandum was a new document called the Program Objective Memorandum (POM), through which the services could outline their […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Neglect of small business at the start of WWII

July 4, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

… little actual headway was made in 1940, primarily because the Army and Navy field procurement officers had been sharply reminded, in the course of […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Is it time for bold changes to weapon systems? Lessons from Germany’s WWII experience

June 24, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

The success of the Nazi drive across Europe proved what the military of other nations had long suspected: that the complete disarmament of Germany after […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Agile development isn’t new to defense, it was just cast out by the “whiz kids”

June 19, 2020 Eric Lofgren 2

It seems clear that the reciprocity of innovation and requirement is unusually important during the period when demonstrations of feasibility are being attempted. The character […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

We can have competition in the most expensive weapons

June 13, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

I think it is terribly important, that the Department of Defense always have the option to buy something else… they should keep their options open… […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Has bargaining power flipped from government to contractor?

June 5, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

… the government paid for much of the industry’s equipment and physical plant, normally a private-sector responsibility. Thus, during the Korean War, taxpayers financed more […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

What Elon Musk would do over in the Starship design

June 4, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

Irene Klotz: In hindsight, if you were doing this all over again is there anything you would’ve done to make the path shorter? Elon Musk: […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Should government perform 30 percent of development in-house?

May 28, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

My distinguished colleague from New Mexico, Mr. Runnels, asked the Defense witness, “Who made this decision to put it-the level of R. & D. to […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Rickover explains why government has so many meetings and reviews

May 26, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

The recent DSARC review of the Navy’s reprogramming request of $23 million for the turbine-electric drive submarine is a typical example… Why then did it […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Inducing contractors to maximize within a budget constraint

May 20, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

During World War II, there was more to accomplish than there were resources at hand. The attitude of contractors was, “How much can we do […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Schriever, the Atlas ICBM, and the question of concurrency

May 15, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

In July 1954 the Scientific Advisory Board had recommended developing an alternative missile to the Atlas. This recommendation was motivated by fear that the pressurization […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Technical progress requires a political process assuming diverse and legitimate interests

May 2, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

It is seldom contended that politics and technology are not separate endeavors and, indeed, that politics is not primary. But if the distinction is to […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Armen Alchian’s radical proposal for military R&D — will we ever take heed?

April 29, 2020 Eric Lofgren 0

When analyzed together, they confirmed the hypotheses that Armen Alchian had first made in 1953 about the dangers of applying systems analysis to weapons acquisition […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

What are the thorniest problems confronting Program Managers?

April 25, 2020 Eric Lofgren 1

Two of the thorniest problems confronting PMs are: The length of time required to process procurement documents [and]… The length of time required to effect […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts pagination

« 1 … 7 8 9 … 14 »

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • The tyranny of lowest price
  • The average defense program takes 10+ years to enter operations
  • US has something to learn from Europeans in austere development
  • 500 Javelin-per-day requirement in Ukraine: Is it reasonable and what could it cost?
  • Financial managers: the “garrison in the conquered city” of the Pentagon?
  • Origins of the Milestone acquisition process
  • Mission-based budgets, getting real oversight, and DoD transformation

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes