Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

History

Cutting contract documentation by 90+ percent

February 3, 2022 Eric Lofgren 1

Here is Air Force general Chapman at a 1971 appropriations supplemental hearing with DepSecDef David Packard, asking for additional funds to do prototyping including funds […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Does documentation eat up 50% of DoD acquisition dollars?

January 28, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

First, the overhead costs of manning the acquisition room are some place between 10 and 50 times what it would cost to proceed on a […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Here’s how much in-house R&D the military services did in the 1960s

January 25, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

That was from a congressional hearing in July 1961.* I’m actually somewhat surprised that the Air Force performed upwards of 20 percent of their RDT&E […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

You can’t make decisions based on 40,000 pages of paper, McNamara was wrong

January 19, 2022 Eric Lofgren 0

MCNEIL: … the budget system got pretty complicated under [Robert] McNamara. It took them years to wake up to the fact that he was not […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

DoD programs are over-analyzed, yet decisions remain superficial and shallow

January 12, 2022 Eric Lofgren 2

I drop you into an exchange between Senator Scoop Jackson and Alain Enthoven, ASD Systems Analysis and one of McNamara’s ‘whiz kids,’ in a 1967 […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

First DoD Comptroller slams naive reformers who invented PPBS

January 4, 2022 Eric Lofgren 1

Here’s DoD’s third Comptroller Charles Hitch testifying to Congress about the need for the new management system he was implementing in DoD: the Planning, Programming, […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

PMs spend too much time at briefings where no decisions are made

December 31, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

In the early 1970s, the Army took it upon itself to review its acquisition system. The AMARC report found that the Army was “profoundly affected” […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Does acquisition depend too much on assumptions, not enough on accountability?

December 16, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

James Roherty’s classic 1970 book, The Decisions of Robert S McNamara has a pair of interesting discussions on the takeover of systems analysis on military […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The role of line and technical officers in the Navy

December 3, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

When Congress established that position, it was clearly understood that the Chief of Naval Operations – the Navy’s highest-ranking military officer – was subordinate to […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Why aren’t more acquisition offices run like Naval Reactors?

November 23, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

The Navy’s success since the 1950s in procuring and safely operating scores of nuclear-powered ships and in developing a succession of reactor designs using fuel […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The process of military innovation — the case of continuous aim firing

November 19, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

One seemingly obvious innovation back a the turn of the 20th century which met heavy resistance within the Navy was an elevation system to keep […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

R&E chief tries to get a handle on the innovation ecosystem

November 12, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

“We’re looking across the entire DoD to look at all the different innovation activity that’s ongoing. I’d like to get my arms around just how […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Why the defense industry competes for “required” systems where 80-90% of the cost is preset

November 9, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Here is Robert J. Judson, Adjunct Prof at NPS, at a 1975 congressional hearing: You will see, if you look next at all of the […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The damage to R&D caused by bureaucrats planning the creative process

November 4, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

Here’s a letter from Bill McClean, chief at Navy’s China Lake and led the Sidewinder development, to the deputy chief of Naval Operations: We find […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Why is defense innovation so slow?

October 19, 2021 Eric Lofgren 0

If a clever engineer imagines a new weapon for the Air Force, and if the research-and-development office specializing in that class of weapons approves of […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts pagination

« 1 2 3 4 … 14 »

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • How cost-plus contracting slowed space technologies, and the shift back to mission-based specs
  • Here’s how much in-house R&D the military services did in the 1960s
  • Opportunity cost of the Air Force’s inventory
  • Acquisition headlines
  • Acquisition headlines (3/7 – 3/13/2021)
  • Acquisition headlines (7/25 – 7/31/2022)
  • The market as a discovery procedure

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes