Acquisition Talk

A daily blog on weapon systems acquisition

  • Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Podcast
  • PPBE Reform
  • About
  • Resources
    • Reading List
    • Links
    • Papers
    • Top Posts
    • AFWERX data
  • Contact

Month: January 2019

The meaning of competition: a guided reading (part III)

January 16, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

This is the final part in a guided reading of Friedrich Hayek’s classic paper, The Meaning of Competition.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Where should Congress focus on weapons choice?

January 15, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

In terms of R. & D. projects, Congress by their own admission can only sample perhaps 10 to 15 percent of the hundreds of unrelated […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The Exchange reacts to itself

January 14, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

The factors that determine activity on the Exchange are innumerable, with events, current or expected, often bearing no apparent relation to price variation. Beside the […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Sunday Links

January 13, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Army acquisition chief answers questions, seems involved in day-to-day program decisions. Map showing where the US military operates across the world. Interesting. … in a recent […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The meaning of competition: a guided reading (part II)

January 12, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

This is part two in a three part guided reading of Friedrich Hayek’s classic paper, The Meaning of Competition.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Boeing’s KC-46 struggles, but here’s the payoff

January 11, 2019 Eric Lofgren 4

The U.S. Air Force on Thursday finally accepted and took ownership from Boeing of its first KC-46A air-to-air refueling tanker, though it pointed to flaws […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

What causes buy-ins on production?

January 10, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

When people in defense talk about “buy-ins”, they are talking about a contractor who purposefully under-bids on a competitively awarded contract. Instead of expecting losses […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The meaning of competition: a guided reading (part I)

January 9, 2019 Eric Lofgren 1

This is part one in a three part guided reading of Friedrich Hayek’s classic paper, The Meaning of Competition. Let’s jump right into it…

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Prediction problems in the acquisition process

January 8, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

The Divad gun program was authorized to use for its procurement an accelerated unconventional acquisition strategy which was approved at a 1977 DSARC meeting when […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Public vs. private innovation

January 7, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

I like to break down innovation into experimentation, evaluation, and evolution. I think that government has a disadvantage at all three.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Sunday Links

January 6, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

I guess we’ll never learn the ills of concurrency. Who keeps Congress accountable for bad decisions? Here’s Navy Matters on the CVN-78. Interesting Quora thread […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

A discussion on program office organization

January 5, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Following up on the podcast, here’s a bonus Q&A with the gracious Victor Deal: Eric: During the podcast, you said: “There’s this sense that perhaps […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Americans in love with analysis

January 4, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

You Americans are mad. You analyze and analyze where we have one-man who makes a decision, and the difference is 5 percent in the resulting answers.

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The innovator’s dilemma of weapon systems

January 3, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

Let’s say the Government has awarded R&D work to a contractor. During the course of the contract, the engineering team spontaneously generates new insight. The […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

An auction trilemma?

January 2, 2019 Eric Lofgren 0

These results imply an auction trilemma. Static, strategy-proof, or credible: An optimal auction can have any two of these properties, but not all three at […]

Share this:

  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Posts pagination

« 1 2 3 »

Get posts by email

Search

Featured

  • John Boyd and the development of EM theory
  • Should government perform 30 percent of development in-house?
  • Time to award a defense contract and the growth of regulation
  • Agile, modular, and digital engineering — Roper’s tenants for the fighter-building business
  • Analysis: How DoD supports the COVID-19 response using Other Transactions
  • Thorny questions about Air Force’s pronounced 100 years of savings
  • Win-win: Liberalism strengthens the military while reducing aggression

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Copyright © 2025 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes